AI ROImedium engagement
AI buyers are demanding proof before paying for transformation
Signals around AI adoption are increasingly framed as a warning to buyers: firms are being pushed to justify costs, avoid redundancy, and prove savings before promising transformation. This reflects the consulting/advisory market pressure to demonstrate measurable ROI, realistic implementation timelines, and governance-aware deployment rather than generic AI enthusiasm.
Draft a post from this →forward deployed engineermedium engagement
Forward deployed engineers are reshaping AI consulting work
Discussion of the 'forward deployed engineer' role frames a broader industry question: whether AI implementation is becoming a consulting model in disguise, or a genuinely new hybrid discipline. This is directly relevant to advisory firms positioning implementation talent, embedded delivery teams, and high-touch adoption support.
Draft a post from this →data engineeringmedium engagement
AI projects keep running into weak data foundations
Several signals point to the same underlying issue: AI success depends on data engineering, platform architecture, and the ability to avoid bloated custom frameworks. The conversation suggests advisory firms that can modernize data foundations and simplify tooling may be better positioned than those selling AI features alone.
Draft a post from this →Salesforcelow engagement
Salesforce buyers still need implementation partners for AI
One thread shows buyers actively searching for Salesforce implementation partners, while another notes Salesforce acquiring an AI research platform. Together they reflect the ongoing demand for specialized implementation expertise inside major enterprise software ecosystems and the consolidation of AI tooling into vendor-led platforms.
Draft a post from this →