Guide
Use an evidence ladder to separate a promising interpretation from a finding you can support, then set a clear drafting threshold.
An angle becomes reportable when you can connect a specific claim to evidence and explain why it matters to a defined reader. A surprising interpretation is a starting hypothesis. Reporting may confirm it, narrow it or overturn it. Keep that possibility open before you invest in a headline.
Write the provisional angle in one sentence. Then underline every factual assertion and causal connection. Those are the parts that need support; confident phrasing cannot supply it.
| Stage | What you have | What you can responsibly do |
|---|---|---|
| Observation | A changed document, account or event | Describe the observation in its context |
| Hypothesis | A possible explanation | Form a reporting question |
| Corroboration | Additional relevant evidence | Test the explanation and alternatives |
| Bounded finding | Support for a specific conclusion | Draft within the evidence's scope |
| Implication | A reason the reader should care | Explain the consequence and its assumptions |
The stages do not always happen in a neat order. The point is to avoid promoting a hypothesis into a finding just because it makes a strong hook.
Suppose a company removes a pricing table from its website. “The company is moving upmarket” is a possible angle. The observation alone only establishes that the table is no longer visible at the checked location and time.
Look for a new pricing page, an announcement, changed plan terms and a company response. Ask customers what they are being offered, with appropriate permission and context. Consider alternatives such as a site redesign or a temporary error.
If the evidence supports a shift to negotiated pricing for certain plans, that narrower finding may be useful to buyers. If the company says it was a site mistake and the table returns, the original angle should change. Do not keep the stronger story merely because you already drafted it.
Before drafting, fill in five lines:
If the evidence supports only a question, publish a clearly framed question only when that itself serves readers. Otherwise keep reporting. Avoid decorating a thin premise with unrelated statistics or quotes that do not bear on the claim.
Put the evidence and limitation into the writing brief together. When using AI assistance, explicitly prohibit invented examples, quotations and missing facts. Review the headline, opening and conclusion against the same evidence threshold as the body.
Use the two-sentence pitch test to make the assignment concise, and the voice brief to express your judgment without inflating certainty.